The learned judge recorded Mr Philip Dykes SC's submissions in these words: "56. ... the absence of an analysis of the conditions without the projects in place meant that it was not possible to ascertain the environmental footprint of the projects. He submitted that it also meant that it was not possible to ascertain the residual impacts of the projects. Without knowing this, it was impossible to know what mitigation measures ought to be required. In respect of the residual impact and mitigation, he referred to TM section 4.3.1(d) and to SB clause 2.1(v)'

 

What's the intrinsic material, extrinsic material, and legislative intent from this judgment from Chu Yee Wah v The Director of Environmental Protection

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

In the excerpt provided from the judgment in Chu Yee Wah v The Director of Environmental Protection we can identify the following Intrinsic Material E... View the full answer