The tutorial $3\text{'}$s canvas$\_$with$\_$timer code measured the width of a string on the canvas and kept the moving word bouncing off the "walls" of the canvas. Which ONE of the following is most correct about how the graphical width of the word was determined?

Question $4$ options:

The width of the moving word string was calculated using the average width of characters multiplied by the number of characters.

The width of the moving word was calculated by 'requiring' the npm 'string$\_$width' module in the server code.

The current string width of the word was computed from a graphics context based on the current font and font size used to draw the word

The word was sent to the server as a JSON object and the server computed the width of the word based on the font characteristics stored on the server.

The width of the moving word string was calculated by changing the canvas font to a monospace font and then using the graphical width of the character $\text{'}$m$\text{'}$ multiplied by the number of characters in the string.