The video for my notes Video link and questions posted below

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/whenkidsgetlife/?

Questions

1. Under what conditions do you think someone should be sentenced to life without parole?

2. Should these conditions apply equally to juveniles as to adults? Why or why not?

3. What factors prompted the change in Colorado from an earlier focus on rehabilitation of juvenile offenders to the present focus on punishment?

4. Jacob Ind murdered his mother and stepfather. Should the circumstances of his home life described by defense attorneys and Jacob's brother mitigate the severity of his punishment? (To "mitigate" is to "lessen in force, intensity or severity.")

Do you think the circumstances they described were "mitigating"?

5. An attorney in the film says that the law treats most harshly children who kill their parents and most leniently parents who kill their children. Why do you think the attorney thinks children are treated more harshly?

6. Shawna Geiger, a defense attorney in Colorado, notes that the Colorado Legislature, when it prohibits adolescents from driving with other adolescents, recognizes that the adolescent brain is not yet fully developed. Yet the same Legislature allows adolescents to be tried as adults for felony murder. How would you explain what Ms. Geiger sees as a contradiction?

7. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights urges rehabilitation for juvenile (under age 18) offenders and prohibits juveniles from receiving life sentences without the possibility of parole. But when the United States ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in 1992, it articulated one exception to the prohibition against juveniles receiving life sentences without the possibility of parole: The most "hardened of criminals" would be treated as adults; juveniles receiving such a sentence would have to be "the worst of the worst."

How would you define the most "hardened of criminals" or the "worst of the worst"?

Do the juveniles profiled in the documentary fit your definition?

Do you consider Colorado law as the documentary describes it as consistent with the International Covenant? Explain in detail.

8. in 2006, the Colorado Legislature passed a reform bill changing juvenile life without parole to 40 years before parole eligibility, but the bill did not make the reform retroactive, so the reform does not apply to any juveniles sentenced before 2006.

Why do you think the Legislature did not make the reform retroactive?

Do you believe the reform should be retroactive? Why or why not?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

It seems like youve provided a link to a documentary and a set of thoughtprovoking questions related to juvenile sentencing and the criminal justice system Lets delve into each question Under what con... View the full answer