There are different ways to design appraisal systems $($format and measurement$).$ There are category rating methods $($eg$.$ Graphic scale, checklist and force choice$),$ comparative methods $($eg$.$ Ranking, paired comparisons & forced distribution$),$ and narrative methods $($eg$.$ Essay, critical incidents and field review$).$ Of these different types which one may be more conducive to a compensation strategy? Explain and support your rationale.