This decision resulted in an interpersonal conflict. Project managers faced the challenge of having to deal with interpersonal conflict in their teamsConflicts between individuals can derail a project's success, harming a team's collaboration and cohesion as well as threatening the project's survivalIn most casesthis conflict results from differences in work ethics, styles, egos $,$ and personalities. Despite their unwillingness, the workers felt pressured to comply with the vaccination mandate. This issue halted the project for another month. Time management was a serious problem at that point. This occurred because the team membersstrike disrupted roles and responsibilities, authority over tasks functions, and decisions. To resolve this deadlockthe administration and project manager emphasized team building and creating an environment that values respecttrust, and care. Therefore, they began negotiating with their workers to resolve the interpersonal conflicts $.$ During negotiations $,$ they decided not to impose vaccinations on them, instead allowing them to make their own choicesIt gave the team members a sense of freedom and relaxation. As a result the interpersonal conflict was resolved. The project manager should view conflicts as opportunities to grow and to move the project forward. It is through conflicts that project managers, stakeholders or any other member of the team can identify and address unforeseen problems $.$ Consequently it helps people become more realrecognize their differences $,$ and maximize their potential Questions What was the conflict in this case? Why did the conflict occur? How could it be resolved? What are the challenges and opportunities created by conflict in modern projects $?$