****THIS IS A SCIENTIFIC REASONING CLASS I COULD NOT FIND THE SUBJECT IN THE GIVEN LIST****

2. Describe the link between the thesis statement and the data. Is there a strong or weak link? For example, if this is an experimental study, do the results support the hypothesis? Is there a strong correlation between variables, and is a causal relationship demonstrated? II 3. Does society play a role in the formation of the study and interpretation of its results? Consider who funded the study so 4. Do you think the researchers were thinking independently when they designed the study? To what extent might they have been influenced by their own sociacentricity, or egocentricity? 5. Do you think researchers explored their underlying feelings about the results? How can you tell? Were they objective in their reporting of the conclusions? 6. Are the results presented in the abstract oversimplifications or generalizations? 7. Are there valid counterarguments to the conclusions made by the researchers? 8. In your metacognition, when you use the recommended terms (Rg 167, conclude, assume, bias, relevance, evidence, justify, consistent) does any particular term(s) help you to become more critical of the research presented? 9. What other evidence or research design could be used to strengthen the conclusions made by the researchers? 3411 1 Normal 1 No Space Heading Heading 2 Subtle Em... Emphasis Title Subtitle Intense Styles Paragraph 2 Facebook Study Analysis Questions 1. What kind(s) of research study is this: Is it experimental, scientific modeling or nonexperimental. How do you know? 2. Describe the link between the thesis statement and the data Is there a strong or weak link? For example, if this is an experimental study, do the results support the hypothesis? Is there a strong correlation between variables, and is a causal relationship demonstrated? 3. Does society play a role in the formation of the study and interpretation of its results? Consider who funded the study 4. Do you think the researchers were thinking independently when they designed the study? To what extent might they have been influenced by their own sociocentricity or egocentricity? 5. Do you think researchers explored their underlying feelings about the results? How can you tell? Were they objective in their reporting of the conclusions? 6. Are the results presented in the abstract oversimplifications or generalizations? 7. Are there valid countetarguments to the conclusions made by the researchers? & In your metacognition, when you use the recommended terms (23 167conclude, assume, bias, relevance, evidence, justify, consistent), does any particular dema) help you to become more critical of the research presented? 9. What other evidence or research design could be used to strengthen the conclusions made by the researchers