Tom and Jane enter into a contract for Jane to stay at Tom's hotel for one week. During her stay, a fire breaks out and destroys much of the hotel. Tom claims that the fire was an act of God and therefore he is not responsible for any damages. Is Tom correct? What other defenses to contract breach might be available to Tom in this situation?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Solution Tom is not correct in claiming that the fire was an act of God and therefore he is not resp... View the full answer