Type or paste question here

'MALAYSIA SULTAN AZLAN SHAR DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Session: 2:2021/2022 Course Code & Code: DPB30073-Business Law Name: Matrix No: Session: 2:2021/2022 Class: Apply the concepts and principles of business law in Malaysia in related business activities. (CLO2, C3) Marks: 25 marks Case Study Reminder: Cheating or plagiarism will not be tolerated. All parties involved in cheating or plagiarism will be given zero marks on the specified assessment Instruction: Read the situation below and answer the following questions. Roslina loves cat very much and this is pretty much evidenced in the number of stray cats she has adopted. After giving it much thought, she decided to turn her passion into business by starting a social enterprise, a type of organization that applies commercial strategies to maximize improvements in the well-being of living being such as stray cats. Since most of her adopted cats are mixed breeds of adult cats and kittens, she has requested from a wholesaler of cat food supplies, HyperCat Food inc. for a type of food that are suitable for all types of cats. The wholesaler has suggested to her Mellow Cat Food, which they claim is suitable for all breeds and ages. Roslina placed an order of 50 packs of Mellow Cat Food for a price of RM75.00/pack, which will be delivered by stages in a month. When the first batch arrived, Roslina finds out that some of the cats refused to eat them and developed some kind of allergy reactions. When they were examined by the vet, Roslina was advised to change the food as it was not suitable for them and might caused them health complication. Roslina took the advice and proceeded to cancel her remaining orders and demanded her money to be returned. HyperCat Food Inc refused to comply and denied any liability due to the usage of their products. Instruction: Answer ALL questions i. Identify the elements of sale of goods as being outline in Section 4 (1) sales of Good Act 1957 (3 marks) ii. What is the legal issues that you can identify in this situation (2 marks) iii. Explain the term warranty and condition as stated in Sales of Goods Act 1957. (4 marks) iv. Explain 'caveat emptor'? Do you think Roslina is entitled to refund and cancel her orders? Explain your answer with relevant provision in Sales of Good Act 1957. (9 marks) v. Describe a relevant case to support your answer (4 marks) vi. Draw a conclusion to the above situation (3 marks) 'MALAYSIA SULTAN AZLAN SHAR DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Session: 2:2021/2022 Course Code & Code: DPB30073-Business Law Name: Matrix No: Session: 2:2021/2022 Class: Apply the concepts and principles of business law in Malaysia in related business activities. (CLO2, C3) Marks: 25 marks Case Study Reminder: Cheating or plagiarism will not be tolerated. All parties involved in cheating or plagiarism will be given zero marks on the specified assessment Instruction: Read the situation below and answer the following questions. Roslina loves cat very much and this is pretty much evidenced in the number of stray cats she has adopted. After giving it much thought, she decided to turn her passion into business by starting a social enterprise, a type of organization that applies commercial strategies to maximize improvements in the well-being of living being such as stray cats. Since most of her adopted cats are mixed breeds of adult cats and kittens, she has requested from a wholesaler of cat food supplies, HyperCat Food inc. for a type of food that are suitable for all types of cats. The wholesaler has suggested to her Mellow Cat Food, which they claim is suitable for all breeds and ages. Roslina placed an order of 50 packs of Mellow Cat Food for a price of RM75.00/pack, which will be delivered by stages in a month. When the first batch arrived, Roslina finds out that some of the cats refused to eat them and developed some kind of allergy reactions. When they were examined by the vet, Roslina was advised to change the food as it was not suitable for them and might caused them health complication. Roslina took the advice and proceeded to cancel her remaining orders and demanded her money to be returned. HyperCat Food Inc refused to comply and denied any liability due to the usage of their products. Instruction: Answer ALL questions i. Identify the elements of sale of goods as being outline in Section 4 (1) sales of Good Act 1957 (3 marks) ii. What is the legal issues that you can identify in this situation (2 marks) iii. Explain the term warranty and condition as stated in Sales of Goods Act 1957. (4 marks) iv. Explain 'caveat emptor'? Do you think Roslina is entitled to refund and cancel her orders? Explain your answer with relevant provision in Sales of Good Act 1957. (9 marks) v. Describe a relevant case to support your answer (4 marks) vi. Draw a conclusion to the above situation