Use the contemporary pro-environment movement as an example, define and explain the difference between the internal and the external audiences for the movement's rhetoric. How does the existence of both the internal and external audiences create conflicts for the movement's advocates? Next, create an argument that explains how climate change advocates could use each of the 5 external confrontative strategies, other than terrorism, to argue for the environment (i.e define each sub-strategy and create an example of its application within the pro-environment movement). In addition, make a case as to whether the strategy would fulfill either of the external functions of confrontative rhetoric.