We'talked about the fact that $O.$ J$.$ Simpsedn was found not guilty of murder in a criminal court, yet he was found liable for damages in a civil court concerning the same incident. Given what you have learned in this class about civil and criminal law, how was this possible?

An individual is always found liable in a civil case after being found not guilty in a criminal case.

The civil court decision was affected by the discovery of new evidence that was not available at the criminal trial.

Civil court decisions are usually wrong more often than criminal court decisions.

The standard for proving guilt in a criminal trial $($beyond a reasonable doubt$)$ is much tougher to meet than the standard of proof in a civil trial $($preponderance of evidence$).$