1. Whattypeof study is used in the article (quantitative or qualitative)?
   1. Explainhow you came to that conclusion.
2. Whattypeof graph or table did you choose for your lab (bar graph, histogram, stem & leaf plot, etc.)?
   1. What characteristics make it this type (you should bring in material that you learned in the course)?
3. Describethe data displayed in your frequency distribution or graph (consider class size, class width, total frequency, list of frequencies, class consistency, explanatory variables, response variables, shapes of distributions, etc.)
4. Draw a conclusionabout the data from the graph or frequency distribution in the context of the article.
5. Howelse might this data have been displayed?
   1. Discuss the pros and cons of2 other presentation options, such as tables or different graphical displays.
   2. Whydo you think those two other presentation options (i.e., tables or different graphs) werenotused in this article?

Percentage of Clinicians and Staff Identified as Having High Burnout 60% 47-57%* (95% CI) 40-50% 42-50% (95% CI) (95% CI) 50% 34-42%* 52% (95% CI) 29-38% 40% 29-37% (95% CI) 46% 45% (95% CI) 28-35% 25-33% (95% CI) (95% CI) 30% 38% 34% 33% 31% 29% 20% 10% MBI MBI Exhaustion MBI MBI Self-Defined Exhaustion MBI MBI Self-Defined Or Exhaustion Cynicism Single Item Or Exhaustion Cynicism Single Item Cynicism Cynicism 0% Clinicians Staff Difference compared to self-defined single item is statistically significant (McNemar's test, p