Question: When evaluating a leader, you should not immediately conclude if the leader is good or bad because you must consider Multiple Choice The overall performance
When evaluating a leader, you should not immediately conclude if the leader is good or bad because you must consider Multiple Choice The overall performance of the team first. How long the leader and the followers have been working together. The leader, the followers, and multiple situations. Whether the followers like the leader and disagreed with the decisions.
Devin just completed a GAPS analysis. What should he do now to further his development plan? Multiple Choice He should start his plan over. He should discuss his findings with his supervisor. He should identify what are the gaps in his GAPS analysis. He should speak with his co-workers about their development plans.
What are the types of power? Multiple Choice Expert, financial, actual, legitimate, and forceful power Coercive, actual, financial, reward, and expertise power Expert, referent, legitimate, reward, and coercive power Referent, legitimate, reward, actual, and high power
How can the second and third phases of development planning be used to improve as a leader? Multiple Choice They can be used to evaluate what areas a leader needs to work on and what resources are available. Those phases can lead to improved comradery on the team. They allow a leader to focus on their followers. They make it apparent what team a leader should work with.
As the HR manager of her corporation, Maria is responsible for documenting formal warnings and sanctions due to misbehavior and poor performance. Which type of power does Maria wield? Multiple Choice Expert power Reward power Coercive power Referent power
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
