While crossing the street, Bobby does not go to a crosswalk but proceeds to illegally cross the street without even checking to see if any vehicles are coming. Steve sees Bobby in the street, notices that he is not in the crosswalk, and proceeds to hit Bobby with his vehicle because he believes that Bobby should be taught a lesson about how to cross the street. Steve does slow down somewhat and only causes Bobby some significant bruising, but Bobby is angry and sues. Which of the following is most likely to happen in a contributory negligence jurisdiction? Multiple Choice

Steve will not be held liable because Bobby was contributorily negligent

Steve will win because of the assumption of risk doctrine.

Bobby will win because of comparative negligence.

Bobby will be able to recover despite proof of contributory negligence on his part because Steve had a final clear opportunity to avoid the action that injured Bobby.

Bobby will lose because Steve reduced his speed.