With the below statement, a fresh approach would be more helpful. Using the statement of Problem Question below, help with the answer to the following using$/$giving a fresh and different answer. Also, provide sources of references and in$-$text citations with the help$/$answers to the Problem Question. Problem Qusetion One afternoon, Jack, Emma, and Alex entered a local grocery store. The teens were acting unusually, rearranging products on the shelves, making snide remarks about other customers, and shouting and playing pranks on each other. Concerned about their disruptive behavior, an employee, Maria, politely asked them to leave the store. Ignoring her request, Jack moved towards the entrance and began flicking lit matches onto the sidewalk. Most matches were extinguished immediately, but a few remained lit. When confronted, Jack claimed the matches couldn't cause a fire from that distance since he was throwing them from a height. Despite his assurance, one ignited match caused a small blaze near the store entrance. Amanda, the store manager, rushed to extinguish the fire. Enraged by the teens' actions, she called Maria for assistance, and together they managed to restrain Jack. In the process of holding him down, Maria accidentally head$-$butted Jack, causing significant injury to his nose and resulting in some bleeding. Jack filed a lawsuit against Amanda and Maria, seeking compensation for the injuries he sustained. His father also filed a lawsuit against Amanda and Maria to cover Jack's medical expenses. Based on your readings so far, who do you think legally deserves what, and why? Before you provide your answer, it would be very helpful if you familiarize yourself with the meaning of tort, how to differentiate between intentional and unintentional torts, Mann v$.$ Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd; $2016$ ONSC $4926,$ Ciba$-$Geigy Canada Ltd$.$ V$.$ Apotex Inc; $1992$ SCR $120,$ and finally intentional torts involving business property.