Write a response to following post:

The Fourth Amendment has been interpreted many different ways and will still be debated going forward. When it comes to keeping sports fair and kids safe, there is a fine line between taking precautions and breeching somebody's Fourth Amendment. Performance enhancing drugs have been a game changer and has become synonymous with the world of sports. When dealing with hyper competitive athletes who have many hours invested in their career, it is easy to see why many turn to PEDs for an edge over the competition. The need for random drug testing is evident for the higher levels of sports. The idea of reasonable suspicion is a moot point with athletes who are already in peak physical shape. They are all physically gifted so it can be hard to stand out. This is where random drug testing proves necessary. Athletes have long considered this an invasion of privacy, but by participating in the organizations they are a part of, they must sacrifice this privacy for the sake of keeping the game fair.

Even with random drug testing, people are hard at work developing and improving the PEDs to outpace the technology designed to detect them. It gets even more complicated when looking at the large variety of supplements that are can be bought in stores and are completely legal in the world of sports. There have been some instances of these over the counter supplements producing a positive drug test. With the legal supplements acting similar to the banned drugs, where can the line be drawn at what is illegal.