You are the chief administrative judge and a law clerk of one of the judges comes to

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Question:

You are the chief administrative judge and a law clerk of one of the judges comes to you to address a concern regarding the judge. She said that immediately after being hired, she felt that the judge was asking her for help or information that didn't have anything about her job responsibilities for example helping with mobile phone and App issues and asking her what presents did she think his daughter of the same age would like. When she talk to her co-worker who is older and had worked for a long time, she was told that the judge is just being friendly , however, she feels that these were not part of her job responsibilities. You ask if did she think the judge was crossing the line and did she want to file an official complaint, She states not really, but she has an uneasy feeling. What you do if anything? Is there any other action you would take? Several weeks later, the clerk asks to see you again and says recently in reviewing a divorce settlement the judge says well they both had extramarital affairs. What do you think about that? She also tells you that the judge that the judge asks her to frequently eat lunch with him in chambers alone and sit physically closer to him. She told you he didn't specially have any physical contact, but was concerned for her job if she didn't agree. What you do if anything?

Several weeks later, the clerk asked to see you again and states that the judge asked her to remove her suit jacket and put it in his closet, when she declined he said I'll just help you and takes her jacket. He says I'm just trying to make you comfortable. What you do if anything?

In summary is there any difference in the Judge actions and the law clerks interpretation? Critically discuss the scenario from the concepts of thoughts/perception of the clerk, words express to her or actions requested of her and words and actions by the judge?