your post is both comprehensive and deeply empathetic, skillfully connecting research and theory to the lived experiences of individuals and families facing divorce. You highlight the interplay of individual, relational, and societal influences from communication issues and infidelity to financial strain and cultural expectations which paints a realistic picture of why marriages dissolve (Broderick and Blewitt, 2019; Amato, 2000). Your exploration of grief and loss is especially thoughtful, noting how the stages of grief apply to both divorce and bereavement but recognizing that the lack of formal rituals or community support in divorce can lead to a unique kind of loneliness or stigma (Kubler-Ross and Kessler, 2005). This perspective invites readers to consider not just the process of loss but also how society's response can shape healing.

Your application of lifespan development and attachment theory further strengthens your analysis, showing how children's developmental stages affect their understanding and coping, while adults may grapple more with practical and emotional complexities (Amato, 2000). You also clearly articulate how attachment theory can be used to foster greater emotional regulation and security in therapy (Mikulincer and Shaver, 2007). As you continue developing your approach as a clinician, how might you help clients or families invent new rituals or supportive practices during times of transition, especially when traditional structures are absent? Encouraging clients to co-create personalized rituals or safe spaces for open dialogue could offer meaningful paths for connection, resilience, and growth in the midst of change. With references