Theorem 3.8 assumes that all calculations for det(A) are done by exact arithmetic. As noted previously, this

Question:

Theorem 3.8 assumes that all calculations for det(A) are done by exact arithmetic. As noted previously, this is usually not the case in software. Hence, computationally, the determinant may not be a valid test for nonsingularity. Perform the following experiment: Let
Theorem 3.8 assumes that all calculations for det(A) are done

Show that det(A) is 0, either by hand or by using your software. Next, show by hand computation that det(B) = -3ϵ, where

Theorem 3.8 assumes that all calculations for det(A) are done

Hence, theoretically, for any ϵ ( 0, matrix B is nonsingular. Let your software compute det(B) for ϵ = (10-k, k = 5, 6, ( ( ( , 20. Do the computational results match the theoretical result? If not, formulate a conjecture to explain why not.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: