Question: 1. The Chapter Case states that P&G is pursuing a differentiation strategy. Looking at the value and cost drivers discussed in this chapter and the
2. Given the discussion in the Chapter Case about P&G slashing its R&D spending and cutting costs and jobs more generally, does the firm risk being “stuck in the middle”? Why or why not? If yes, why would being “stuck in the middle” be a bad strategic position?
3. Your task is to help Mr. Lafley sharpen P&G’s strategic position. Which strategic position along the productivity frontier should P&G stake out? Which value and/or cost drivers would you focus on to improve P&G’s strategic profile? How would you go about it? What results would you expect?
Step by Step Solution
3.44 Rating (157 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 In the macro environment PG experienced a powerful impact from the recession which surprised them somewhat because detergent had typically been a so... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
366-B-M-L-S-M (714).docx
120 KBs Word File
