Question: 1. What was the plaintiffs claim in the intermediate appellate court? 2. What was the appellate courts decision? 3. What rationale did the court give

1. What was the plaintiff’s claim in the intermediate appellate court?
2. What was the appellate court’s decision?
3. What rationale did the court give for its decision?

Lifson, J.
The underlying facts of this case are not in dispute. After many years of living together in an exclusive intimate relationship, Neil Conrad Spicehandler (hereinafter Conrad) and John Langan endeavored to formalize their relationship by traveling to Vermont in November 2000 and entering into a civil union. They returned to New York and continued their close, loving, committed, monogamous relationship as a family unit in a manner indistinguishable from any traditional marital relationship.

Step by Step Solution

3.53 Rating (163 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 He claimed that denying samesex spouses the right to file a wrongful death suit and potentially ob... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

179-L-B-L-L-E (1524).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!