Question: 1. Which arguments should be given more weight: those based on company policy, the employee handbook, and the labor agreement, or mitigating factors given by

1. Which arguments should be given more weight: those based on company policy, the employee handbook, and the labor agreement, or mitigating factors given by the grievant and his witnesses? Explain.
2. How might unprofessional conduct be defined? Explain.
3. If you were the arbitrator, how would you rule in this case? Explain fully the reasons for your decision.

At the arbitration hearing, both parties were adamant in their positions. Nancy Huang, HR manager of Phoenix Semiconductor, argued that the grievant, Jesse Stansky, was justly terminated for arguing and hitting a co-worker—a direct violation of company policy and the employee handbook. Stansky argued that he had been a good employee during his ten years of employment.

Step by Step Solution

3.36 Rating (171 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 Arbitrators will give different weights to facts and evidence presented in an arbitration hearing ... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

160-B-H-R-M-E-R (149).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Human Resource Management Questions!