Consequentialist Analysis: We have covered how we can use thought experiments and consequentialist analysis in order to
Question:
Step One: Make a list that identifies all relevant moral actors in your dilemma. This could include (for example) supervisors, co-workers, or clients. Don't forget to include yourself.
Step Two: Tentatively propose two courses of action. (This should be very brief, one or two sentences each.)
Step Three: Carry out consequentialist analyses of each moral action. For everyone on your list in step one, what are the likely benefits and harms of each course of action? What are possible benefits and harms of each course of action? What are unlikely but remotely possible benefits and harms of each course of action?
Step Four: Reflect on a consequentialist analysis: does one course of action obviously win? Are there any other courses of action which could further maximize benefit while minimizing harm?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Accounting Principles Part 1
ISBN: 978-1118306789
6th Canadian edition
Authors: Jerry J. Weygandt, Donald E. Kieso, Paul D. Kimmel, Barbara Trenholm, Valerie Kinnear, Joan E. Barlow
Question Posted: