Question: Lockheed Martin Idaho Technical Company (LMITCO) (plaintiff) requested bids for a comprehensive fire-alarm system in its 12 buildings located in Idaho Falls. Mountain West Electric
Lockheed Martin Idaho Technical Company (LMITCO) (plaintiff) requested bids for a comprehensive fire-alarm system in its 12 buildings located in Idaho Falls. Mountain West Electric (MWE) (defendant) was in the business of installing electrical wiring, conduit, and related hookups and attachments. Fox provided services in designing, drafting, testing, and assisting in the installation of fire-alarm systems. The parties decided that it would be better for them to work together, with MWE taking the lead on the project. The parties prepared a document defining each of their roles and jointly prepared a bid. MWE was awarded the LMITCO fixed-price contract. In May 1996, Fox began performing various services at the direction of MWE's manager.
1. What is the issue in this case?
Clue: What is the question about which the parties are disagreeing?
2. What must the court have found for it to decide to overrule the district court?
Clue: How would a clear meeting of the minds about how Fox was to have been compensated have changed this decision?
Step by Step Solution
3.48 Rating (178 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 The issue in this case is compensation Because the orders from the original ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
244-L-B-L-L-E (1890).docx
120 KBs Word File
