The purpose of this experiential exercise is to reflect on the implications of t the Wisconsin law that weakens public-sector unions, as explained in this case, by thinking about how you would answer the following questions: Do public- sector employees need unions to represent their interests to administrators in government? Is it better to be a member of a weak public-sector union or not be a union member at all? Since most employees who work in the public sector have their job security protected by civil service rules that require the application of due process, are public-sector unions really necessary to act as an advocate for employees? Do you agree with Governor Walker of Wisconsin that public-sector unions are a too powerful a force in local elections that gives support to public officials who cater to their economic interests and works to defeat public officials who oppose union interests, which, unless union power is restrained, lets them obtain an unfair amount of government resources? Be prepared to explain the reasons for your answers when called upon by the instructor.