a$.$ Let's run through some examples of how this might work, in a setting where the Fed wants to keep AD growth stable at $\backslash (10\backslash \%\backslash ).$ To keep things simple, we will assume that the Fed can control money growth perfectly. We will also assume that a $\backslash (1\backslash \%\backslash )$ change in money growth causes a $\backslash (0\mathrm{.}5\backslash \%\backslash )$ shock to velocity growth in the same direction. Using these assumptions, fill in the missing values for the following table. For each case:

$\backslash (\backslash$mathrm$\{$AD$\}=\backslash )$ Initial Velocity Shock $+$ Money Growth

$+$ Velocity Shock Caused by Money Growth

Round your answer to the nearest hundredth.

Year $2$ money growth:

$\backslash \%$ Year $2$ velocity shock:

$\backslash \%$ Year $3$ velocity shock:

Year $3$ money growth:

$\backslash \%$

$\backslash \%$