A study compared three display pane's used by air traffic controllers. Each display panel was tested for four different simulated emergency conditions. Twenty-four highly trained air traffic controllers were used in the study. Two controllers were randomly assigned to each display panel-emergency condition combination. The time (in seconds) required to stabilize the emergency condition was recorded. The following table gives the resulting data and the JMP output of a two-way ANOVA of the data Emergency Condition m MAN 22 19 31 1 32 15 37 12 res Means Est in ate Condition Estime 24. 560860 32. 166667 3.303 nce Mean Square Prob 26. 1949 6-6961 Adjustment = Tukey Sto t Ratio Prob 2. 172604 -6.25 6. 6062- -16 - 3126 2- 172604 -12.79 1 - 172684 3.27 0. 6297- 2. 3521 . 5657 1. 172684 -6.54 0.6061- -11. 1479 2. 172604 9.52 . 172604 16.06 15 . 352reject Ition effect ise compariso of emergency conditions t. 2. connoen ervals. (Round your answers to 4 decimal (3.84540) (11.5154X 7.3248X (4.1854 14.6548x aminimizes the time required to stabilize an emerge he required to stabilize an interaction. To disp percent Uindividual confidence interval for the mean time reg pane (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.) 6.37. 12.63