Question: Can a direct mapped cache sometimes have a higher hit rate than a fully associative cache with an LRU replacement policy (on the same reference
Can a direct mapped cache sometimes have a higher hit rate than a fully associative cache with an LRU replacement policy (on the same reference pattern and with the same cache size)? If so, give an example. If not explain why not?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
