DEAR: Just Section 7 need to be done for this paper, I have repeated the descriotion below just to make it clear. Thanks The course name is Organizational Leadership and textbook I am taking now is: (This paper will be based on 2previous papers that you have already done, if you need these paper and you don't have it I can attach it anytime you will need them. For answering this paper, please you must to read carfully the instruction: The project idea or course project summary: You are a manager in a large company, and you are assigned to a mentor. Your mentor is very excited that you are taking this particular course and has therefore asked you to develop and share your own personal theory of leadership. This person wants you to be very detailed in this process and submit a report for review. In Milestone One (very first paper you have done), you completed Part one of the project by reviewing and critiquing theories of leadership. In Milestone Two (recent paper you have done), you developed a personal theory of leadership and completed part 2. In this milestone( this paper ), you will complete part 3 by discussing how to apply your personal theory of leadership. NOW for this part you must cover only Section 7: ALL SECTIONs belowhas be addressed and done for this paper EXCEPT SECTION 7 need to be covered: Section 1 Application: Scenario: Describes scenario in past or present workplace, explaining its impact on internal and external stakeholders. DONE Section 2 Application: Personal Theory: Describes how personal theory of leadership is applied to scenario, addressing it at the individual, group, and organizational levels. DONE Section 3 Application: Decision Making: Explains how personal theory of leadership influenced decision making and impact on transformational change in scenario. DONE Section 4 Application: Effectiveness of Theory: Evaluates effectiveness of personal theory of leadership, identifying potential issues or weaknesses in relation to transformational change. DONE Section 5 Application: Evaluation Tool: Determines tool for evaluating personal theory of leadership as it relates to transformational change, identifying key features of the tool supporting continuous improvement of theory. DONE Section 6 Conclusion: Summary: Summarizes personal theory of leadership connecting to identified leadership theories, exemplary and anti-exemplary leaders, and past or present organizational context. DONE THE ONLY PART NEED TO BE DONE IS THIS SECTION 7 , ONE PAGE IS ENOUGH. Section 7 taught to other: Summarizes how personal leadership theory can be taught and influence transformational change in an contemporary organization. NEED TO BE DONE Below the last paper that is need last section (7) to be completed only Apply Personal Leadership Scenario In my line of duty, I have experienced several instances that relate and touch on transformational leadership; however one stands out: Our real estate company normally carries out staffing and recruitment of new talent every first month of the year. Last year, about fourteen energized youth were absorbed into our system and went through rigorous training for about a month. Our job description demands that an individual has strong interpersonal skills to be able to solicit potential clients into either buying or selling property or advice agent's prices and market conditions. Further, one must possess traits such as intelligence, creativity, management skills as well as charisma to be able to lead a team or influence potential clients (Northouse, 2015). All these skills were incorporated into their training program before they were deemed ready for the actual field. The management developed a system where new recruits had a practical program which divides them into groups and then they are sent to the field to interact with actual clients. Usually, the Coordinator of the program goes to the field in person; this time, however, he decided to select two experienced co-workers to lead these teams. Mr. Conley led the Red team and Mrs. Ann, the Blue team. Mr. Conley decides to incorporate S1 and s2 leadership styles irrespective of diversity within his group; coaching and closely directing individual recruits on what to do. He selected an overall team leader who was supposed to report to him, and no action was to be taken before consulting him. Mrs. Ann, on the other hand, opted for a more participatory approach where she first listened to her team assessing their individual capabilities before offering her advice on how to capture clients and gave each individual targets and goals. Her extraversion traits and charisma inspired confidence and self-motivation to team members; also, she allowed critical thinking within the team giving them freedom to create informal groups with leadership. After one week of engaging in work related activities such as promoting properties, soliciting/advising clients, mediating negotiations between buyer and seller and taking prospective buyers to see properties, the blue team emerged victorious regarding the number of clients it had captured as well as customer satisfaction levels. This scenario had an impact on internal stakeholders such as management and employees; after evaluating the results, the HR department altered their training program to incorporate delegation, shared decision making and sensitizing trainees of important leadership traits such as creativity. It had an impact on external stakeholders such as the satisfied clients who developed loyalty towards our products and services; referrals to other clients increased substantially. Personal Theory My Personal theory of leadership incorporates situational; Greatman's theory and traits leadership hence have been applied widely in the scenario I have provided above. First of all the leadership of the red team used S1 style associated with directing and a high task-low relationship behavior; this leadership style also allows for one-way communication as evidenced when Mr. Conley doesn't allow his team members to offer their opinions or reservations. This team also used S2 styles of leadership that is associated with coaching and high task-high relationship behavior; the leadership allowed limited two-way communication evidenced when Mr. Conley allows the team leader he had selected to report directly to him (Nohria & Khurana, 2013). The blue team incorporated aspects of the leadership theory where Mrs. Ann allowed two-way communications such that all team members could air their views on any contentious issues. The team members were also participating in decision making by giving opinions on how tasks could be accomplished for example how some clients can be attracted. The delegation was very clear in the context as the leadership understood team dynamics and allowed the team to form informal groups with leadership. Aspects of self-motivation were present highlighted when this leadership designed personal goals to be achieved by individual team members. Essential leadership traits are also present for instance; extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, charisma, intelligence, creativity, achievement motivation and management skills are in abundance under the blue team leadership (Nohria & Khurana, 2013). Mrs. Ann is an individual who is sociable, assertive and has energy and zeal; tendencies associated with an extraversion trait. She shows conscientiousness by designing goals depending on the follower's capabilities. Charisma is evidenced by her ability to instill self-motivation and confidence into her team. Intelligence and creativity are exhibited by her ability to understand group dynamics and allowing the formation of informal groups that improve teamwork and productivity. Management skills are evident throughout the process as she was an excellent coordinator of team activities. The only favorable trait possessed by Mr. Conley is technical knowledge as he was very astute in detailed concepts of real estate (Gill, 2011). Decision Making Personal leadership theory elements were very important in the decision-making process in the scenario above. A great example was the decision to design personal goals for every team member; organization and team goals are normally affected largely by the achievement of individual goals. Her knowledge on techniques to provide self-motivation allowed her to take the above resolution. Her decision to let the team form informal leadership and groups was based on her understanding of leadership necessities such as delegation. This is also factored in when the red team leadership decided to select a leader that would be reporting directly to Mr. Conley. The decision to allow team members to air their opinions, views and concerns on several elements affecting the tasks on the ground was based on awareness of the S3 leadership style that advocates for shared decision making by team members in an attempt to accomplish tasks (Bass & Riggio, 2006). Effectiveness of Theory Personal leadership theory is a very effective tool especially in trying to precipitate change as well as getting rid of traditional leadership practices that have become outdated. A delegation of authority is a very effective tool as it resulted in self-motivation and confidence among followers. Since followers are given the opportunity to lead, the trait is inculcated in them giving them the confidence to take up larger roles in the future. Two-way communication and participatory technique allow leaders to understand their followers and design attainable personal goals. By allowing her team to share their opinions on how tasks would be approached, Mrs. Ann was indirectly able to assess her team's capabilities. Use of leadership theory aspects such as knowledge on maturity levels and capabilities allowed her to designate the team in such a way that it accomplished great results. Intelligence, creativity, and Management skills attribute allowed her to set up the team such that informal groups and leaderships were developed. Informal groups are essential as they enhance team bonding (Goleman, Boyatzis, & McKee, 2013). Evaluation Tool Multifactor leadership questionnaire (MLQ5X) would be the ideal tool for measuring personal leadership. This tool measures a wide range of leadership types, from passive leaders to those who offer active rewards and punitive actions to followers as well as transformational leaders who induce leadership confidence into their juniors (Cook & Hunsaker, 2001). It is the ideal tool to evaluate transformational change since it possesses components that allow for measurement of leaders who transform followers to leaders; delegation of authority is one technique that is very effective when leaders are trying to motivate followers into embracing leadership roles. It also has the capability of exposing traits of transformational leaders for example extraversion, technical knowledge, creativity, and problem-solving capacity. Features of the tool such as contingent rewards, idealized influence, and inspirational motivation are essential in supporting continuous improvement (Judge & Piccolo, 2004). Summary From the above discussion, it is clear that several personal leadership theory traits are complementary to the leadership theories. Shared decision making and two-way communication are associated with situational leadership. The delegation of authority evidenced by the red team leadership is emphasized in situational leadership as well. Understanding maturity levels of followers as well as altering leadership style to match those of followers as evidenced by blue team leadership is a part of situational leadership. Illustrated traits such as charisma, extraversion, management skills, technical knowledge, and creativity, and motivation creation are connected to traits and Greatman's leadership theories (Nohria & Khurana, 2013). These attributes were widely used by renewed leaders such as Winston Churchill. Exemplary leadership in the situation above is shown by Mrs. Ann while anti-exemplary leadership is shown by Mr. Conley. An example of a real world leader who has embraced similar leadership attributes and is in the real estate sector is tycoon Barbara Corcoran. She is the co-founder of real estate business The Corcoran group and is estimated to worth $80 million. I uploaded the whole paper work to make it easy and clear to you when cover the only last part SECTION 7 for ONE PAGE ONLY JUST COVER THIS SECTION: Last Section (7) taught to other: Summarizes how personal leadership theory can be taught and influence transformational change in an contemporary organization