Do you agree with the posted below? why? please explain one short paragraph

Participation:

It is very important who is working any company, he/she better to participate in the organization's policy. In other words, participatory decision-making has the advantage of reducing the risk. Employee participation so many different in the business environment. One form of participatory leadership is the participatory representation, which involves a group of employees involved in the decision-making process of an organization.

Consensus:

There is a risk that any decision will be well-thought-out and superficial, but it is important to make sure that it is based on science, to do research, and to agree on what information to gather. In that case, a good decision will be made. Comparing two identical things on a given topic, good and bad, similar and different. Comparisons are a type of strategy used to develop any task.

- What are the advantages and disadvantages of each one?

- Differences and similarities

Both participation and consensus are important in decision-making on contingency and urgent and unexpected project perspective.

For example: Everyone's voice should be heard, and it looks more equitable. However, ensuring everyone's participation is very difficult and time consuming for an urgent project. On the other hand, reaching a consensus during a urgent project also has the disadvantage of being time-consuming. Not everyone can be satisfied. In the event of an unexpected project, the most important thing is to make a decision. However, this decision must take into account all the risks and advantages. The best solution is... in the event of a decision, you must first ensure participation and then negotiate very well.