How will you use what you learn from this project to develop as a leader/manager? What will be the role of scheduling and project management for you? How have your skills to manage a project changed over the course of this program?

As my project am doing a company analysis on google so what should be my answer for the above question?

And here is the Rubric on which they want the answer

BU695 Unit 2 Discussion Criteria Ratings Pts Content 8.5 pts Level 3 7.5 pts Level 2 7 pts Level 1 O pts Level O 10 pts Level 5 Post addresses all of the required prompt elements in the discussion 9 pts Level 4 Post addresses all of the required prompt elements in the discussion - does not demonstrate a full understanding of course content and unit topic. Post is missing important elements, demonstrates limited understanding of topic and/or course concepts, offers limited validation of personal position. There is evidence of some supporting evidence, there is a reference to the research literature, text, course materials, or related examples. Post and responses are missing important elements related to the discussion and demonstrate a lack of understanding of the topic and lacks validation of position, and/or there is no use of supporting items of evidence. Post does not address discussion questions, and/or does not demonstrate understanding of the topic and/or lacks validation of position with no use of supporting items of evidence. Post was not submitted or there is no relationship between the post and the discussion prompt. 10 pts O pts Analysis PRICE- 8 pts Level 3 7 pts Level 3 6.5 pts Level 1 10 pts Level 5 The analysis of the topic includes breadth and depth, is aligned to the unit topic, relates to the course content and personal analysis is supported by well aligned references and examples. 9 pts Level 4 The analysis of the topic is justified, and aligned to the unit topic, and personal analysis is supported by well aligned references and/or examples. There is a basic analysis of the topic and personal analysis is supported by well aligned examples. There is no evidence of analysis. There is minimal evidence of analysis of the topic and/or personal analysis is not supported by well aligned examples or references. Level O Post was not submitted or the analysis had no relationship to the topic and the discussion prompt. 10 pts Collaboration O pts 7 pts Level 4 4.5 pts Level 1 PRICE-E Level 0 8 pts Level 5 Collaborates with fellow learners at the required level relating the discussion to relevant course concepts and extending the conversation by asking open-ended questions to move conversation forward. Also answers questions asked on the post by instructor and peers. Post was not submitted Collaborates with fellow learners at a comprehensive level and relates the content to relevant course concepts but does not extend the conversation by asking open-ended questions. There are responses evident to questions asked by instructor or peers. 6.5 pts Level 3 Collaborates with fellow learners but does not respond at a comprehensive level, and/or does not extend the conversation by asking or answering questions, and/or makes little connection to course content. 5.5 pts Level 2 Does not collaborate with fellow learners regarding the peers posts and/or makes no connection to course content and/or does not respond to peer and instructor responses; or the number of responses did not meet the requirement. Does not collaborate with fellow learners and instructor. 8 pts Writing 8 pts Level 5 6 pts Level 4 4.5 pts Level 3 4 pts Level 2 2 pts Level 1 O pts Level 0 Post was not Posts in this discussion are well written and well organized demonstrating excellence in scholarly writing. Mechanics (spelling and punctuation) and grammar are excellent. submitted. Posts in this discussion are well written and well organized scholarly material but have 1-2 different minor errors in mechanics and/or grammar. Posts in this discussion are not clear and/or lack organization and/or have 4 or more different errors in mechanics and/or grammar. 8 pts Posts in this discussion are basic examples of scholarly material but have 3 different errors in mechanics and/or grammar Posts in this discussion lack evidence of clear, organized scholarly writing. APA 4 pts Level 5 3 pts Level 4 2.5 pts Level 3 2 pts Level 2 1 pts Level 1 O pts Level 0 PRICE-I Post was not Posts in this discussion demonstrate appropriate in-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style. Posts in this discussion demonstrate appropriate in- text citations of sources and references but have 1-2 minor APA errors. Posts in this discussion demonstrate appropriate in- text citations of sources and references but have 3-4 minor APA errors. Posts in this discussion demonstrate appropriate in- text citations of sources and references but have more than 4 APA errors. submitted. 4 pts Posts in this discussion do not provide either in- text citations or reference sources and/or have 4 or more APA errors. Total Points: 40