Module M HW Data Training Program Tenure Sales Enhanced Rookie 29 Enhanced Rookie 41 Enhanced Rookie 42 Enhanced Veteran 42 Enhanced Veteran 36 Enhanced Veteran 31 Standard Rookie 16 Standard Rookie 24 Standard Rookie 28 Standard Veteran 36 Standard Veteran 37 Standard Veteran 40.5 Sterling Cooper is director of employee performance at West Coast Pharmaceutical. Company policy requires annual training for all sales staff. Mr. Cooper suspects training programs make little difference for veteran employees but thinks that a quality training program may lead rookie employee performance to match performance of veteran employees more quickly. He devises a study to determine if an enhanced training program will be especially beneficial to new employees. For the study he gives an enhanced training to half of his veteran employees and to half his rookie employees. His other employees, half of whom are veterans and half of whom are rookies receive the standard training program. His data is available in the ModuleM HW Data file. Download it and conduct an ANOVA with tenure (rookie or veteran) and training program (standard or enhanced) as the grouping variables. Use sales as the outcome variable. For some questions you will need to ask for eta-squared, descriptives, marginal means, and simple effects of training program when you do your analysis. Use the results to answer the following questions. At the .05 significance level, is the main effect for tenure significant (answer by typing yes or no)? What is the marginal mean for the rookies (round to 3 places)? What is the marginal mean for the veterans (round to 3 places)? What is dig for the main effect of tenure? What is div? What is F for the main effect of tenure (round to 3 places)? What is p for the main effect of tenure (round to 3 places)? What is eta-squared for the main effect of tenure (round to 3 places)? How large is the eta-squared for the main effect of tenure? (Answer by typing small, small to medium, medium, medium to large, or large)? At the .05 significance level, is the main effect for training program significant (answer by typing yes or no)? What is the marginal mean for the enhanced program (round to 3 places)? What is the marginal mean for the standard program (round to 3 places)? What is dig for the main effect of training program? What is F for the main effect of training program (round to 3 places)? What is p for the main effect of training program (round to 3 places)? What is eta-squared for the main effect of training program (round to 3 places)? How large is the eta-squared for the main effect of training program? (Answer by typing small, small to medium, medium, medium to large, or large)? At the .05 significance level is the interaction significant? What is dig for the interaction? What is F for the interaction (round to 3 places)? What is the p-value for the interaction (round to 3 places What is eta-squared for the interaction (round to 3 places)?| How large is the eta-squared for the interaction? (Answer by typing small, small to medium, medium, medium to large, or large)? Note that you will have to add a test of simple effects to your analysis to answer the next several questions. It was theorized that the difference in sales between the two training programs would be significant for rookies, but not for veterans. Based on the simple effects tests, did rookies have significantly more sales with the enhanced training than with the standard training (answer by typing yes or no)? Based on simple effect tests, was the training program effect NONsignificant for veterans (answer by typing yes or no)? What is the absolute value (meaning answer without including a + or - sign) of the difference between the cell means for the rookie enhanced group compared to the rookie standard group (round to 3 places)