please answer these 3 questions

1 Some Uber Drivers Travis Kalanick, the former CEO of the app-driver, Peter Robb, the general counsel of the board, concluded car-hailing service, Uber Technologies Inc., was used that Uber drivers are independent contractors and to engaging in legal battles and protests about his not employees. He argued that the drivers set their company. Many city governments have fought the hours, own their vehicles, and are free to work for Uber right of Uber to exist in their city because they believe competitors, so they cannot be considered employees Uber does not conform to regulations for taxi services. under federal law. Now many of the part-time drivers who use their own A pending California law later in 2019 threatened vehicles to transport customers are claiming they Uber's position that its drivers should be classified as should have the same types of benefits as full-time contractors. The law states that a worker is only an employees. A handful of lawyers are encouraging some independent contractor if (a) he or she is not under of these drivers to sue Uber to meet their demands, the control or direction of the company while working, saying the company is violating labor laws. One driver (b) if the work is "outside the usual course of the who works about 20 hours per week said, "Life is tough company's business, and (c) if he or she is "customarily enough as a cabbie without being treated like a second- engaged" in the same kind of work that he or she class citizen." performs for the company. Yet Uber Chief Legal officer Uber management pointed out that more than Tony West argued that the company should be able half of Uber's drivers work nine hours per week or less, to continue to classify drivers as contractors. "Just therefore they should be classified as contractors, not because the test is hard doesn't mean we will not be able employees. According to the CEO, driving for Uber is to pass it" One Uber argument is that the usual course not a full-time job, but "a way to fill in the gaps." He of its business is to provide a technology platform to its also argued that the drivers want to be independent drivers, in exchange for a service fee. Uber customers contractors because they enjoy being their own bosses. are therefore the drivers, not the riders. contractors because they enjoy being their own bosses. One group of drivers filed a lawsuit against the company, with the contention that Uber is illegally classifying them as contractors to avoid paying them millions of dollars in expenses. In one specific suit, an Uber driver named Barbara Ann Berwick filed a wage complaint with the California Labor Commissioner. Among her demands was reimbursement for gas and bridge tolls. The Uber attorney argued that Berwick was not an employee and was therefore not entitled to reimbursement for business expenses. The California labor Commissioner disagreed and awarded Berwick over $4,000 in business expenses and back interest. Among the many legal points raised was that drivers are not engaged in an occupation that is separate and distinct from Uber's core business. Also, the fact that the company provided drivers with iPhones and monitors their approval ratings by passengers moves the drivers closer to employee status. Uber management's argument of classifying drivers as contractors was strengthened by a National Labor Relations Board advisory memo in May, 2019. To mollify the drivers a little, Uber management has given drivers some benefits, such as access to health care coverage and discounts on gasoline. Case Questions 1 What might Uber management do to keep Uber drivers happy, and not file lawsuits against the company? 2 How might the job of an Uber driver be enriched? 3 Why is this case significant for management throughout most of the modern world