Question: Potential Failure Mode & Effects Analysis Process / Product: FMEA Date: ( original ) FMEA Team: ( Revised ) Responsibility: Page: of Prepared By: Process
Potential Failure Mode & Effects Analysis
ProcessProduct: FMEA Date: original
FMEA Team: Revised
Responsibility: Page: of
Prepared By:
Process Actions Results
Process Steps or Product Functions Potential Failure Mode Potential Effects of Failure Severity Potential Causes of Failure Occurrence Current Controls Detection Risk Priority Number RPN Recommended Action Responsibility and Target Completion Date Action Taken Revised Severity Revised Occurrence Revised Detection Revised Risk Priority Number
Score Severity Guidelines
AIAG Six Sigma
Hazardous without warning Injure a customer or employee Bad
Hazardous with warning Be illegal
Very High Render product or service unfit for use
High Cause extreme customer dissatisfaction
Moderate Result in partial malfunction
Low Cause a loss of performance which is likely to result in a complaint
Very Low Cause minor performance loss
Minor Cause a minor nuisance but can be overcome with no performance loss
Very Minor Be unnoticed and have only minor effect on performance
None Be unnoticed and not affect the performance Good
Score Occurrence Guidelines
AIAG Six Sigma
Very High: Persistent Failures, Ppk More than once per day Bad
Very High: Persistent Failures, Ppk Once every days
High: Frequent Failures, Ppk Once every week
High: Frequent Failures, Ppk Once per month
Moderate: Occasional Failures, Ppk Once every months
Moderate: Occasional Failures, Ppk Once every months per
Moderate: Occasional Failures, Ppk Once per year per
Low: Relatively Few Failures, Ppk Once every years per million
Low: Relatively Few Failures, Ppk Once every years per million
Remote: Failure is Unlikely, Ppk Once every years per billion Good
Score Detection Guidelines
AIAG Six Sigma
Almost Impossible: Absolute certainty of nondetection Defect caused by failure is not detectable Bad
Very Remote: Controls will probably not detect Occasional units are checked for defects
Remote: Controls have poor chance of detection Units are systematically sampled and inspected
Very Low: Controls have poor chance of detection All units are manually inspected
Low: Controls may detect Manual inspection with mistakeproofing modifications
Moderate: Controls may detect Process is monitored SPC and manually inspected
Moderately High: Controls have a good chance to detect SPC is used with an immediate reaction to out of control conditions
High: Controls have a good chance to detect SPC as above, inspection surrounding out of control conditions
Very High: Controls almost certain to detect All units are automatically inspected
Very High: Controls certain to detect Defect is obvious and can be kept from affecting the customer Good
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
