Question: Potential Failure Mode & Effects Analysis Process / Product: FMEA Date: ( original ) FMEA Team: ( Revised ) Responsibility: Page: of Prepared By: Process

Potential Failure Mode & Effects Analysis
Process/Product: FMEA Date: (original)
FMEA Team: (Revised)
Responsibility: Page: of
Prepared By:
Process Actions Results
Process Steps or Product Functions Potential Failure Mode Potential Effects of Failure Severity (1-10) Potential Cause(s) of Failure Occurrence (1-10) Current Controls Detection (1-10) Risk Priority Number (RPN) Recommended Action Responsibility and Target Completion Date Action Taken Revised Severity (1-10) Revised Occurrence (1-10) Revised Detection (1-10) Revised Risk Priority Number
Score Severity Guidelines
AIAG Six Sigma
10 Hazardous without warning Injure a customer or employee Bad
9 Hazardous with warning Be illegal
8 Very High Render product or service unfit for use
7 High Cause extreme customer dissatisfaction
6 Moderate Result in partial malfunction
5 Low Cause a loss of performance which is likely to result in a complaint
4 Very Low Cause minor performance loss
3 Minor Cause a minor nuisance but can be overcome with no performance loss
2 Very Minor Be unnoticed and have only minor effect on performance
1 None Be unnoticed and not affect the performance Good
Score Occurrence Guidelines
AIAG Six Sigma
10 Very High: Persistent Failures, Ppk <0.55 More than once per day >30% Bad
9 Very High: Persistent Failures, Ppk >=0.55 Once every 3-4 days <30%
8 High: Frequent Failures, Ppk >=0.78 Once every week <5%
7 High: Frequent Failures, Ppk >=0.86 Once per month <1%
6 Moderate: Occasional Failures, Ppk >=0.94 Once every 3 months <0.03%
5 Moderate: Occasional Failures, Ppk >=1.00 Once every 6 months <1 per 10,000
4 Moderate: Occasional Failures, Ppk >=1.10 Once per year <6 per 100,000
3 Low: Relatively Few Failures, Ppk >=1.20 Once every 1-3 years <6 per million
2 Low: Relatively Few Failures, Ppk >=1.30 Once every 3-6 years <3 per 10 million
1 Remote: Failure is Unlikely, Ppk >=1.67 Once every 6-9 years <2 per billion Good
Score Detection Guidelines
AIAG Six Sigma
10 Almost Impossible: Absolute certainty of non-detection Defect caused by failure is not detectable Bad
9 Very Remote: Controls will probably not detect Occasional units are checked for defects
8 Remote: Controls have poor chance of detection Units are systematically sampled and inspected
7 Very Low: Controls have poor chance of detection All units are manually inspected
6 Low: Controls may detect Manual inspection with mistake-proofing modifications
5 Moderate: Controls may detect Process is monitored (SPC) and manually inspected
4 Moderately High: Controls have a good chance to detect SPC is used with an immediate reaction to out of control conditions
3 High: Controls have a good chance to detect SPC as above, 100% inspection surrounding out of control conditions
2 Very High: Controls almost certain to detect All units are automatically inspected
1 Very High: Controls certain to detect Defect is obvious and can be kept from affecting the customer Good

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!