Question $30(1$ point$)$

Bobdog manufactures large machines that crush cars for recycling. The machine had a clear warning on it that the area should be clear prior to pressing the "crush" button. However, the operator ignored this warning and another worker, Joan, was seriously injured. Based on class discussion and product liability laws what is the likely outcome of a lawsuit if Joan sues Bobdog?

Bobdog's warning is a complete defense to a product liability case.

The operator of the machine is negligent and the operator negligence "comparatively" eliminates the negligence of Bobdog.

Bobdog is negligent per se$.$

If Joan presents evidefince that Bobdog could have improved safety and prevented this accident with simple changes to the machine design then Bobdog will be liable.