Read the Lucy case study. Separately answer the following two questions. Be sure to use concepts from the text and the case study to answer the questions. These should be substantive responses, and not a simple yes or no answer. Each question should have an answer that is a few paragraphs, minimum. 1. Why did the judge decide that intoxication was an inadequate reason for voiding the contract? 2. To what extent does the objective theory of contracts enter into the judges reasoning in this case