Reading Test Article . Saved to this PC m. ign Layout References Mailings Review View Hp Find - ABbc ab AaBbc AaBb AaBbc Normal No Space Heading Heading 2 Heading Select- Paragraph Eating Styles revellus mack wurking from home cur now numal, your bows and Uncle Sam should chip in By William M. Mode Holder Center professor of polley and the with University Wed, but the wited States has severitatis Carrot The Canarit works as well as employers writing to the case be cob. Whether Important that the employer or the govercome the forme wolken Prior to the pandei, apoyo pero of the workforce one full day pet. Aldouch not directly compartimefctober, about a mono th, reported and the quarter of those workers we between the of. The shore apired by their but it almost anything this cabat The drived lot of charbone office to continentes mobile devin doadband applications to novinhomes in a households locattol detaly populated produce pomoct, but also to motor and work to the same location The fing the stores con hore benyttes Tod, but berishi padechave been operat. Taste Wooowocate the date met atlatformen ndodh perorall Animelectro home heated to posypartea or hotel room locum E 9 11 Gymn the towph times and the hardships manly all Americans are suffering you can argue that remote workers especially works able to relocate should be grateful to have a job and the resources to purchase a new home, move to a second home or extend the best of thesr vacation Rental contract. But even though working remotely can bent employees, employers and the government need to cover a significant portion of the expense when done because of a health emergency or other imposed re Of course, remote work can confer a variety of employee benefits and cost savings by reducing commutes, the need for extensive wardrobes and having to eat out, at the same time it provides the psychological benefits of not having to sit in traffic or wait on a train platform. There can also bea direct bottom line improvement: potential tax breaks Full-time employees working remotely may be eligible for a home office tax dedectie, albeit tot necessarily at the same rate as freelancers. Some estimates sugest met We approximately $4,000 per year But panden det. Fast, the employee Deeds to create a dedicated room or space for working. This means, at minimum a desk light chair, office supplies and utilities such as interner 2002. Depending on the nature of the work employees may need new electronic devices, bersecurity measures and IT infrastructure enhances so they can effortly access the company's To handle these requirements, employers must haserati non eligibility, wailability, responsiveness to co-worker reguests, productivity treasures, equipment, technical support the ergonomies of the employee's workspace security and dient confidentiality. But bow should we determine who pays for remote work employees, oplo Unde Sam conomic theory on who bears the costs of job training could provide some insight in the case of job training when the hills the employee needs to acquire are specific and nonportable than employers need to finance the workplace toest. But if the acquired an ealand Something the employee will benefit from wherever their career as the employees themselves should cover the treatment Appoing this logic to remote workouts that if the resource Deded to ock retty are also they can be used during exeployment at another company, the employee ayeed to cover the costs amples indade desks, lights, paper, Pandens. How if a company management team in remote work as a benefit they get reward Bi employees, then employers would need to foot the bill just like any perk they offer On the other hand, if the resources to work remotely are specific to the employer, meaning they are not transferable from that employer or useful in notwork activities, then the employer should bear the costs of supplying them, which can take the form of a voucher or a reimbursement There's another factor to take into consideration in calculating how to distribute this burden, however. Since there are societal benefits to remote work - such as less traffic congestion, fewer road accidents, reduced carbon dioxide emissions and more investment in family life and child care --there's a rationale for the government playing a role in covering the costs. Further, the fact that the pandemic has and continues to be very disruptise physically and emotionally for many families and their communities provides additional reason for the government to make this investment For now, I see a splitting of the costs of working remotely. But if it becomes the new normal for a large segment of office workers, the next president and Congress will need to assist with reducing the cost Overview For this test, use "lf Covid has made working from home our new normal, your bo Sam should chip in" by William M. Rodgers III. Be sure to use the SQ3R strategy to read. Remember to read critically and question as you read. . Note Taking Using a style reviewed at the beginning of the semester take notes. Remember to include: Author, title, and publisher information Article thesis Minimum of 5 key points . At least two comments related to: o Bias/ opinion o credibility/ authority o Intent/ purpose o Message o Assumptions of the author Evidence Critical Reading Questions 15 W Critical Reading Questions (5 marks x2) Answer two of the following questions in a well-developed paragraph Remember to give attribution to the author and provide evidence to support your ideas. 1 What does the writer expect you to understand or believe after reading? Do you agree with their message? 2. How much evidence is used? What kind? 3. What are some of the challenges that employees face when they switch to working remotely? 4. Do you think the article is credible? Give reasons 5. Describe the author's tone. I 11 Normal 1 No Spac.. Heading 1 He Paragraph Styles IC Covid has made working from home our new normal, your boss and Uncle Sam should chip in theus ha sercement or the intende ortay. And ICT eriplove and the west site consid Mev. 30, 2020, 12:31 PMI CAT By William M. Rodgers III, professor of public polloy and chlef economist at the Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University Working remotely in new, but the United States has never seen it at its current scale. The shift can benefit workers as well as employers and society writ large -- but there can also be costs. When those costs are financial, it's important that the employer or the government covers the bill for remote workers. Prior to the pandemic, approximately 12 percent of the U.S. workforce workad frarn home for at least one full day per month. Although not directly comparable, as of October, about 32 million Americans, or one- fifth, reported telework due to the pandemnic, and almost three-quarters of those workers are between the ages of 25 and 54. The shift might have been inspired by the coronavirus, but it's almost certainly something this cohort should be prepared for going forward. This sadden migration involved a lot of change, from setting up home offices to creating remote hubs using mobile devices and cloud-based applications to moving homes entirely. Many households relocated to less densely populated areas in part to reduce exposure to infection, but also to have more space to live and work in the same location. Those fleeing the nation's urban centers have been mainly limited to San Francisco and New York, but other mobility shifts that emerged during the pandemic have been more prevalent. Last summer, many vacation communities saw more of their second-home owners relocate there for the entire summer, or at least for longer stays than usual. A Pew Research Center survey found that 13 percent of Americans who moved relocated to a second home, while another 7 percent relocated to temporary homes, apartments or hotel rooms. w Reading Test Article . Saved to this PC m. ign Layout References Mailings Review View Hp Find - ABbc ab AaBbc AaBb AaBbc Normal No Space Heading Heading 2 Heading Select- Paragraph Eating Styles revellus mack wurking from home cur now numal, your bows and Uncle Sam should chip in By William M. Mode Holder Center professor of polley and the with University Wed, but the wited States has severitatis Carrot The Canarit works as well as employers writing to the case be cob. Whether Important that the employer or the govercome the forme wolken Prior to the pandei, apoyo pero of the workforce one full day pet. Aldouch not directly compartimefctober, about a mono th, reported and the quarter of those workers we between the of. The shore apired by their but it almost anything this cabat The drived lot of charbone office to continentes mobile devin doadband applications to novinhomes in a households locattol detaly populated produce pomoct, but also to motor and work to the same location The fing the stores con hore benyttes Tod, but berishi padechave been operat. Taste Wooowocate the date met atlatformen ndodh perorall Animelectro home heated to posypartea or hotel room locum E 9 11 Gymn the towph times and the hardships manly all Americans are suffering you can argue that remote workers especially works able to relocate should be grateful to have a job and the resources to purchase a new home, move to a second home or extend the best of thesr vacation Rental contract. But even though working remotely can bent employees, employers and the government need to cover a significant portion of the expense when done because of a health emergency or other imposed re Of course, remote work can confer a variety of employee benefits and cost savings by reducing commutes, the need for extensive wardrobes and having to eat out, at the same time it provides the psychological benefits of not having to sit in traffic or wait on a train platform. There can also bea direct bottom line improvement: potential tax breaks Full-time employees working remotely may be eligible for a home office tax dedectie, albeit tot necessarily at the same rate as freelancers. Some estimates sugest met We approximately $4,000 per year But panden det. Fast, the employee Deeds to create a dedicated room or space for working. This means, at minimum a desk light chair, office supplies and utilities such as interner 2002. Depending on the nature of the work employees may need new electronic devices, bersecurity measures and IT infrastructure enhances so they can effortly access the company's To handle these requirements, employers must haserati non eligibility, wailability, responsiveness to co-worker reguests, productivity treasures, equipment, technical support the ergonomies of the employee's workspace security and dient confidentiality. But bow should we determine who pays for remote work employees, oplo Unde Sam conomic theory on who bears the costs of job training could provide some insight in the case of job training when the hills the employee needs to acquire are specific and nonportable than employers need to finance the workplace toest. But if the acquired an ealand Something the employee will benefit from wherever their career as the employees themselves should cover the treatment Appoing this logic to remote workouts that if the resource Deded to ock retty are also they can be used during exeployment at another company, the employee ayeed to cover the costs amples indade desks, lights, paper, Pandens. How if a company management team in remote work as a benefit they get reward Bi employees, then employers would need to foot the bill just like any perk they offer On the other hand, if the resources to work remotely are specific to the employer, meaning they are not transferable from that employer or useful in notwork activities, then the employer should bear the costs of supplying them, which can take the form of a voucher or a reimbursement There's another factor to take into consideration in calculating how to distribute this burden, however. Since there are societal benefits to remote work - such as less traffic congestion, fewer road accidents, reduced carbon dioxide emissions and more investment in family life and child care --there's a rationale for the government playing a role in covering the costs. Further, the fact that the pandemic has and continues to be very disruptise physically and emotionally for many families and their communities provides additional reason for the government to make this investment For now, I see a splitting of the costs of working remotely. But if it becomes the new normal for a large segment of office workers, the next president and Congress will need to assist with reducing the cost Overview For this test, use "lf Covid has made working from home our new normal, your bo Sam should chip in" by William M. Rodgers III. Be sure to use the SQ3R strategy to read. Remember to read critically and question as you read. . Note Taking Using a style reviewed at the beginning of the semester take notes. Remember to include: Author, title, and publisher information Article thesis Minimum of 5 key points . At least two comments related to: o Bias/ opinion o credibility/ authority o Intent/ purpose o Message o Assumptions of the author Evidence Critical Reading Questions 15 W Critical Reading Questions (5 marks x2) Answer two of the following questions in a well-developed paragraph Remember to give attribution to the author and provide evidence to support your ideas. 1 What does the writer expect you to understand or believe after reading? Do you agree with their message? 2. How much evidence is used? What kind? 3. What are some of the challenges that employees face when they switch to working remotely? 4. Do you think the article is credible? Give reasons 5. Describe the author's tone. I 11 Normal 1 No Spac.. Heading 1 He Paragraph Styles IC Covid has made working from home our new normal, your boss and Uncle Sam should chip in theus ha sercement or the intende ortay. And ICT eriplove and the west site consid Mev. 30, 2020, 12:31 PMI CAT By William M. Rodgers III, professor of public polloy and chlef economist at the Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University Working remotely in new, but the United States has never seen it at its current scale. The shift can benefit workers as well as employers and society writ large -- but there can also be costs. When those costs are financial, it's important that the employer or the government covers the bill for remote workers. Prior to the pandemic, approximately 12 percent of the U.S. workforce workad frarn home for at least one full day per month. Although not directly comparable, as of October, about 32 million Americans, or one- fifth, reported telework due to the pandemnic, and almost three-quarters of those workers are between the ages of 25 and 54. The shift might have been inspired by the coronavirus, but it's almost certainly something this cohort should be prepared for going forward. This sadden migration involved a lot of change, from setting up home offices to creating remote hubs using mobile devices and cloud-based applications to moving homes entirely. Many households relocated to less densely populated areas in part to reduce exposure to infection, but also to have more space to live and work in the same location. Those fleeing the nation's urban centers have been mainly limited to San Francisco and New York, but other mobility shifts that emerged during the pandemic have been more prevalent. Last summer, many vacation communities saw more of their second-home owners relocate there for the entire summer, or at least for longer stays than usual. A Pew Research Center survey found that 13 percent of Americans who moved relocated to a second home, while another 7 percent relocated to temporary homes, apartments or hotel rooms. w