Sandeep is the team leader of a university program at a local university. The other members of the team are a combination of full & part-time professors and full & part-time students. The team is evaluating the current program and has been provided with feedback from multiple stakeholders in the program. Some of the feedback recommends that the program change/update a tool that has been used for over 30 years. Sandeep identifies to the team that they completely disagree with the feedback because the too! has always worked and made the program strong. Other team members quickly agree with Sandeep, highlighting that changing the tool would be challenging and take a lot of work. A few more team members agree and suggest that the program has never been stronger. Weiye, a new member of the team, believes that the feedback is sound and that it should be considered. However, given how quickly the rest of the team has discounted the feedback, they choose to agree with the consensus afraid that if they did disagree they would negatively impact how they get along with the other group members. Describe what this case is an example of. how this type of behavior is dangerous and how it could be avoided in the future?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

It may be a formidable revealing also as exciting and definitely necessary a part of any universitys regular planning and improvement agenda to have interaction in open discussions with its key stakeh... View the full answer