The 3 articles below is my classmate discussion post can you please give explanation why you agree with the articles below? ( there is three different articles attached below answer them separate please) Can you please include at least 1 -2 references with accurate link each of the new sources using APA format and in text citation ?

In response to your request for Apple software technicians unlock the phones in question, I base my decision on how the outcome benefits or hinders the greater amount of people (Gilbert, 2016, pg. 48). I understand that your department feels the number of stakeholders is limited to our respective offices and the two members in custody, however that is incorrect. There are over 1.4 billion iPhone users throughout the world (Shubham, 2024), and the action you are requesting could prove devastating to their privacy. I acknowledge that this is a matter of national security for you, however this is a matter of what is right for us and our user, which 153 million are U.S. citizens (Shubham, 2024). Innocent, law-abiding citizens have a right to data privacy, which should not be taken away or potential compromised through legal action intended for a small few. Jurisdiction over data privacy should include existing data privacy principles (Lee, 2016, pg. 3), such as those we have at Apple. For these reasons, I respectfully decline your request for code to be written that allows access to iPhones because the request is too broad based on our policy (Apple, 2024). Such code could jeopardize the remaining users, including those within your own organization. The FBI has a duty to investigate to counter terrorism and organized crime (FBI, 2024), and Apple has a duty to uphold the values placed within our policies. Sincerely, Mr. Cook, CEO Sources: Gilbert, J. (2016). Ethics for managers: Philosophical Foundations and business realities. Routledge. Shubham, S. (2024). iPhone User & Sales Statistics, https://www.demandsage.com/iphone-user-statistics/ Apple (2024). Information Request, https://www.apple.com/privacy/government- information-requests/I do agree with the decision that utilitarianism leads to in these cases. Utilitarianism states that morality requires actions that create the greatest happiness or good for the largest number of people (Gilbert, 2016). In this case it could be argued that the entire country would benefit from the FBI having access to the shooter's phones in the San Bernardino, California and Naval Air Station Pensacola attacks. I think that if law enforcement has a warrant to search a phone the tech companies should assist in that endeavor. I do not see this as different from a landlord turning over a key to an apartment when presented with a search warrant. I believe that we are subject to laws whether we agree with them or not. If a tech company is compelled by a court to do something after a legal process, then that process should be enforced. I think that in these cases rights and duties can be seen through different lenses. Rights are claims and privileges while duties are seen as the requirement to fulfill the rights of others (Gilbert, 2016). The shooters had the right to privacy before committing their crimes, but others in similar situations have all relevant property searched including phones. However, the other side of this argument would say that they do not want to protect criminals, nor do they plan on committing crimes, but they want absolute privacy. This belief clashes with the duty of law enforcement to protect the public. Neither the test of rights and duties nor fairness and justice changed my opinion about these cases. References: Gilbert J, (2016), Ethics for Managers, Philosophical Foundations and Business Realities, Utilitarianism, https://viewer-ebscohost- com.ezproxy.umgc.edu/EbscoViewerService/ebook? an=1249059&callbackUrl=https%3a%2f%2fresearch.ebsco.com&db=nlebk&forma t=EB&profld=edsebook&lpid=&ppid=pp_48&lang=en&location=edm&isPLink=Fal se&requestContext=&profileIdentifier=2jmwdc&recordld=bfyzxkkoifConcerning the case between the FBI and Apple the main stakeholders include the government of the US, the law enforcement agencies, the Apple company, employees, its consumers, and society in general (Moser & McDonald, 2022). Apple's decision to refrain from obeying the court ruling is mainly advantageous in the following ways: Apple protects the privacy of its customers. However, it simultaneously puts a nation's security at risk in that it hinders law enforcement from receiving information that may otherwise prevent such acts (Moser & McDonald, 2022). its From a large communicator perspective, it is perhaps most optimal that Apple does the right thing and obeys the court order (Moser & McDonald, 2022). This could perhaps assist in averting the occurrence of future terrorist attacks - thus preserving the larger population of people. However, this approach poses a great ~danger to individual privileges particularly the right to privacy and it could be a precedent to the infringement of civil liberties (Moser & McDonald, 2022). Concurring with the utilitarian outcome is relative to people's value systems. In case of high priority of national security, it will be seemingly justified to make a utilitarian decision. However, if one has to give preference to the individual privacy rights then the decision is wrong (Moser & McDonald, 2022). If RithS and Duties or Fairness and Justice tests were to be applied, the decision might reach a different conclusion altogether. These frameworks prescribe the stewardship of key freedoms and the implementation of decisions that would not be prejudicial or disadvantageous to any party (Moser & McDonald, 2022). Under these principles, Apple's actions might be justified as it stands for independence, freedom, and privacy of individuals in the face of a threat posed by the government; this underlines the fact that, while fighting for security, one should remember about civil liberties. Reference Moser, R. and McDonald, P. (2022) The FBI & Apple: Security vs. privacy | ethics | unwrapped, Ethics Unwrapped. Available at: | https:/ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/21-The-FBI- Apple-Security-vs.-Privacy.pdf