This is a business law question PLEASE I really need HELP !!! PLEASE answer ALL questions!!!! THANK YOU.

Which of the following is INCORRECT regarding the main purpose rule as it relates to a promise to pay someone else's debt? The court's job is to use the context surrounding the agreement to determine the third party's main purpose for entering the agreement. If the main purpose for incurring a primary obligation is to obtain a personal benefit, the promise does not fall within the statute of frauds and must be in writing. If the main purpose for incurring a secondary obligation is to obtain a personal benefit, the promise does not need to be in writing. The main purpose rule assumes that a party attempting to achieve a personal benefit will not back out of the agreement; thus, there is no need for a written record of the O If the main purpose for incurring a secondary obligation is to obtain a personal benefit, the promise does not need to be in writing. The main-purpose rule assumes that a party attempting to achieve a personal benefit will not back out of the agreement; thus, there is no need for a written record of the agreement. The main-purpose rule is an exception to the general rule that a promise to pay someone else's debt needs to be in writing