While this challenge was being made, assume that REM was permitted to take over PMG's duties under the contract. Starting in January 2020, students began to complain that REM did not always have a roving guard around parking spaces outside. On February 1, 2020, a student was assaulted while going to his car, and was sent to the hospital. Assume the administration of HDLS took no formal action against REM, but did post signs about the incident around the school, warning students to take care. Because of this incident, students would like to sue REM claiming they are third-party beneficiaries of PMG's (and thus REM's) contract with HDLS. Being a public law school, HDLS is a government entity. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of this argument.