• After reading Chapters 9 and 10, re-read Case 9.5 - Zeidman v. Fisher, and respond to the following prompts.

  Questions:

• If Zeidman had signaled to his partners that all was clear from the fairway and was then hit while returning in the cart, would Fisher be entitled to a summary judgment based on the assumption of the risk?
• What other leisure sports or activities might be covered under the assumption-of-risk doctrine? Is it good public policy to shield negligent parties with the doctrine?