What is the AVID Program and how would using the Kirkpatricks model of Evaluation make it useful in a school setting. using the data from East Urban High School.

References:

https://learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com/5c06bfb1d2454/3715116?X-Blackboard-S3-Bucket=learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos&X-Blackboard-Expiration=1713852000000&X-Blackboard-Signature=ZlBXV4HEpb2fOt0liyJhwPzTuLf13v13ji5Ph5Hl3uc%3D&X-Blackboard-Client-Id=100929&X-Blackboard-S3-Region=us-east-1&response-cache-control=private%2C%20max-age%3D21600&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27EDC%25207502%2520Week%25207%2520AVID%2520Data.pdf&response-c

Reference:

Rubric Details

Maximum Score

50 points

• Evaluation Model

40% of total grade

Meets or Exceeds Standard

-Benefits of the model you choose to use are clearly outlined -Model as used correctly to evaluate the AVID program

85 - 100%

Approaching Standard

-Benefits of the model you choose to use are included -Model as used to evaluate the AVID program with a few errors

70 - 84%

Does Not Meet Standard or Missing

-Benefits of the model you choose to use are not included -Model was not followed to evaluate the AVID program

0 - 69%

• Evaluation of Avid Programs

40% of total grade

Meets or Exceeds Standard

-AVID evaluation included areas of growth and strengthens for the building are included with specifics -AVID evaluation includes next steps for the building -AVID evaluation includes a specific timeline -AVID evaluation incorporates student learning data. -The vehicle chosen to present evaluation is appropriate

85 - 100%

Approaching Standard

-AVID evaluation included areas of growth or strengthens for the building are included with specifics -AVID evaluation includes some next steps for the building -AVID evaluation includes rough timeline -AVID evaluation incorporates student learning data. -The vehicle chosen to present evaluation is hard to follow

70 - 84%

Does Not Meet Standard or Missing

-AVID evaluation included areas of growth and strengthens for the building are not included with specifics -AVID evaluation does not include next steps for the building -AVID evaluation is lacking a timeline -AVID evaluation does not incorporates student learning data. -The vehicle chosen to present evaluation was not appropriate

0 - 69%