why did i get this wrong and what is the correct answer?

correct Question 11 0/5 pts You have just been offered a job by a multinational company. You impressed the interviewers because you knew a lot about international trade. For example, they mentioned a case of a recent foreign market entry, a country that adopted severe restrictions to trade, of a protectionist nature. You got the job because you showed how you knew the consequence of trade restriction for such country was MOST LIKELY: Benefit domestic consumers, but not domestic producers Increase of long term competitiveness of domestic industries This question is about CONSEQUENCES OF INTERVENTION IN TRADE. Out of all options provided, only in one the consequence listed is a predictable outcome of the case mentioned in the question. Indeed, heavy restriction to trade tends to produce outcomes such as loss of economic growth and domestic jobs in the long term: increased domestic prices; benefits producers at the expense of consumers: decrease of long term competitiveness of domestic producers, as well as retaliation by foreign countries, affecting local exporters in unrelated industries and a vicious downturn cycle. Your answer is INCORRECT because you DID NOT pick the alternative portraying one of such correct consequences. Increase in domestic jobs only in the short term Increase of long term economic growth