A former student has authored the verbatim posting below. Read it carefully and choose which of the options below best describes it: $$

I work as a fitness advisor at a fitness club. What I do there is help clients pick personal training plans that fit their needs and schedules. The client who I was working with last week was recommended a personal training package for $3$ days a week for the next $6$ months. The price was not an issue; however, the timeline was. He wanted to lose $30$lbs in $3$ months rather than $6$ months like the package was designed for. The client did not have much knowledge in weight loss and exercise, so I had to find a middle ground to meet his wants and needs. $3$ months was too short, and he felt $6$ months was too long, so we were able to come to a $5$ month agreement, adding an extra personal training day to each week. While I was interacting with my client, I used integrative strategy to get the best possible outcome. I used the integrative strategy because I wanted it to be a win$/$win situation, the communication line between the both of us were open, and focused on a mutually beneficial for the both of us$.$

This scenario is a pure distributive strategy.

This scenario is a combination of distributive and integrative strategies.

This scenario is a pure integrative strategy.

This scenario is neither a distributive nor integrative strategy.