New Semester
Started
Get
50% OFF
Study Help!
--h --m --s
Claim Now
Question Answers
Textbooks
Find textbooks, questions and answers
Oops, something went wrong!
Change your search query and then try again
S
Books
FREE
Study Help
Expert Questions
Accounting
General Management
Mathematics
Finance
Organizational Behaviour
Law
Physics
Operating System
Management Leadership
Sociology
Programming
Marketing
Database
Computer Network
Economics
Textbooks Solutions
Accounting
Managerial Accounting
Management Leadership
Cost Accounting
Statistics
Business Law
Corporate Finance
Finance
Economics
Auditing
Tutors
Online Tutors
Find a Tutor
Hire a Tutor
Become a Tutor
AI Tutor
AI Study Planner
NEW
Sell Books
Search
Search
Sign In
Register
study help
business
technical communication
Technical Communication 14th Edition John M. Lannon, Laura J. Gurak - Solutions
Does this design meet the audience’s needs and expectations? (300)
Are headings visually consistent and grammatically parallel? (298)
Is the phrasing of headings consistent with the document’s purpose? (298)
Are headings formatted to reflect their specific level in the document? (297)
Do headings clearly announce the large and small segments in the document? (297)
Is the highlighting consistent and tasteful? (297)
Do full caps highlight only single words or short phrases? (296)
Are typefaces and type sizes chosen for readability? (295)
If different typefaces are used, are they used consistently? (293)
In general, are versions of a single typeface used throughout the document? (293)
Is a series of parallel items within a paragraph formatted as a list (numbered or bulleted, as appropriate)? (293)
Are paragraphs free of “orphan” lines or “widows”? (291)
Is each paragraph tailored to suit its purpose? (291)
Is line spacing appropriate and consistent? (290)
Is the right margin unjustified? (290)
Is line length reasonable? (290)
Are the margins ample? (293)
Does the white space create areas of emphasis? (290)
Does the grid structure provide a consistent visual theme? (288)
Are page numbers, headers, and footers used consistently? (287)
Is the visual placed near the text it is helping to describe? (278)
Does the left side of a broadside table face the bottom of the page? (278)
Is the visual set off by adequate white space or borders? (278)
Is the visual positioned on the page to achieve balance? (278)
Do all design elements (title, line thickness, legends, notes, borders, white space) achieve balance? (278)
Is the visual easy to locate? (278)
Does the visual respect readers’ cultural values? (275)
Is the visual ethically acceptable? (273)
Is color used tastefully and appropriately? (269)
Is the visual uncrowded, uncluttered, and free of “visual noise”? (278)
Are all decimal points in each column of a table aligned vertically? (248)
Is this the best type of visual for my purpose and audience? (241)
Can the visual itself (along with any captions and labels) stand alone in terms of meaning? (239)
Is the visual introduced, discussed, interpreted, integrated with the text, and referred to by number? (239)
Has written permission been obtained for reproducing or adapting a visual from a copyrighted source? (239)
Are all data sources cited? (239)
Are captions and explanatory notes provided as needed? (243)
Do the visual relationships represent the numeric relationships accurately? (239)
Are all values or units of measurement specified (grams per ounce, millions of dollars)? (239)
Are all patterns identified by label or legend? (239)
Is the visual titled and numbered? (239)
Is the level of complexity appropriate for the audience? (238)
Does the visual serve a valid purpose (clarification, not mere ornamentation)? (237)
Is the word choice ethically and legally acceptable? (231)
Does the piece display sensitivity to cultural differences? (230)
usage? (227)
Is the piece free of implied bias, sexist language, or potentially offensive
Is the level of formality what the intended audience would expect? (227)
Is the tone appropriate and consistent for the situation and audience? (223)
Have I reviewed the spelling, grammar, and word choice to be sure spell check or autocorrect didn’t insert any errors? (223)
Are analogies used to clarify and explain? (223)
Are general or abstract terms clarified by more specific or concrete terms? (222)
Does the wording precisely convey the intended meaning? (220)
Is the piece free of triteness, misleading euphemisms, and overstatement? (220)
Is each acronym spelled out upon first use? (220)
Is the wording simple, familiar, unambiguous, and free of useless jargon? (218)
Are short sentences used for special emphasis? (217)
Does an idea that should stand alone for emphasis get a sentence of its own?(217)
Are sentences varied in construction and length? (217)
Are related ideas subordinated or coordinated and combined appropriately?(215)
Is the piece free of clutter words and needless qualifiers? (214)
Have negative constructions been converted to positive ones, as needed? (213)
Have excessive prepositions been removed and nominalizations restored to their verb forms? (212)
Have unnecessary weak verbs been converted to verbs that express a definite action? (211)
Is it free of needless sentence openers and prefaces? (210)
Is the piece free of wordiness, redundancy, or needless repetition? (209)
Does each sentence provide only as much information as readers are able to process easily? (208)
Are sentences in active rather than passive voice, unless the agent is immaterial?(205)
Do most sentences begin with the familiar information and end with new information?(205)
Are modifying nouns unstacked? (204)
or explains? (204)
Is each modifier close enough to the word or words it defines
Does each pronoun clearly refer to the noun it replaces? (203)
Have I considered my audience’s specific cultural expectations? (199)
If appropriate, does the document include an overview, offering a larger picture of what will follow? (198)
Does each paragraph include these features? (197)• topic sentence (introduction)• unity (body that supports the topic sentence)• coherence (connected line of thought leading to a conclusion)
Is the information chunked into discrete, digestible units for the proper medium(print, PDF, Web)? (197)
Have I created a storyboard to supplement my formal outline? (191)
Is this outline organized using alphanumeric or decimal notation? (189)
Will the outline allow me to include all the necessary data for the document? (188)
Does the document employ a standard or varied introduction/body/conclusion structure? (185)
Is this summary ethically acceptable? (181)
Does the executive abstract tell readers how to think about the information?(180)
Does the descriptive abstract merely tell what the original is about? (180)
Is the source of this summary documented? (172)
Is the summary’s level of technicality appropriate for its audience? (169)
Is the summary economical yet clear and comprehensive? (171)
Is the summary free of needless details? (169)
Is the summary free of any additions to the original? (171)
Is the summary accurate when checked against the original? (171)
Can the summary stand alone? (171)
Does the summary contain only the essential message? (170)
Have I documented all sources not considered common knowledge? (632)
Are all paraphrases accurate and clear? (631)
Are all quotations accurate and integrated grammatically? (631)
Are direct quotations used sparingly and appropriately? (629)
Is all quoted material clearly marked throughout the text? (629)
Is my documentation consistent, complete, and correct? (628)
Am I getting the whole story, and getting it straight? (165)
Can I rule out any possible error or distortion in a given study? (163)
Showing 2700 - 2800
of 5434
First
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Last
Step by Step Answers
Get 50% OFF
Claim Now
